>Not all members of the KKK committed terrorist act does that mean I shouldn't blame their ideology for spreading hatred and violence?

They most certainly did, since they had a choice in being part of it or resisting it, and they choose the former. On the other hand, a Syrian doesn't have a choice to not be a Syrian, they are born Syrian and that has nothing to do with being part of a cult or supporting any one ideology.

>I too have met Syrians, Saudis, Afghans, Kurds, Algerians, Turks, Lebanese, Persians, Moroccans, Egyptians, Pakistanis and Libyans who were not only not my enemies but were my friends and very good friends they are.
Like my many Communist friends they are good people who do no wrong nonetheless both their ideologies seek the destruction of my civilization and the wonderful way of life I have enjoyed(I grew up on welfare so don't yap at me about privilege, unless you mean compared to third world communist shitholes).

They can't be both your friends and your enemies, so recalibrate again because you cannot make sense if you call your friends enemies.

>Nice try calling me a xenophobe, I moved from a small town into Vancouver BC one of the most diverse cities on earth, and I love it!

Exactly what did you read, because I didn't call you anything but a moron, an idiot and imbecile. Either I called you a xenophobe or I didn't, exactly like you calling me a biggot, despite the obvious lack of rationale behind that nonsense label. By your logic, because you live in a certain place you couldn't possibly be spreading xenophobia, willingly or unwittingly? The same logic that says "all Syrians are our enemies because all Syrians adhere to the Quran and the ideology".

>Have you ever heard the Media call black people racist for their actions during a race riot?

Racism is systemic discrimination, biggotry isn't necessarily systemic, institutionalized discrimination. 

>Do you remember how long it took the Media to call the kidnapping and torture of that mentally handicapped white man what it was a hate crime?

And? The insinuated nonsense is that the media is excusing such acts?

>The only difference between a lynching and a race riot was white people didn't burn down their own neighbourhoods.

Classic, keeping up the story that lynchings which were condoned by the public with the support of the law is anything like the crimes committed by a mob. Lynchings we're publicized as justice by the media, not a crime at all, with group photos to display the pride behind such despicable acts.

>Same motivation to take "justice" into their own hands with violence which happened throughout American history for many different reasons and was not confined to the oppression of black people,

Woosh, the sound facts make as they travel nee high over your head because systemic discrimination wasn't confined to black people.

Fail at logic: because it's written in the Quran and people read the Quran then all people who read the Quran adhere to everything the Quran says. Systemic discrimination isn't confined to black people, neither are Jim Crow laws.

You level slander based on asthetics and want to reason that a lynching condoned by the judges and police with the applause of the media is comparable to the acts of a mob, because who cares "why" they were being lynched, in effect dismissing the very poigniant difference between the two.

Where and when? Keep digging the hole trying to justify the "unrelated facts" as sensible.
#everones-ancestors-went-through-segregation-and-public-lynchings-condoned-by-the-system-and-media-at-the-time-and-theres-the-equivalent-of-Jim-Crow-laws-for-everyone