RE: The Way British News Channels are Covering the London Terrorist Attacks are 100x Better Than US Counterparts by redhens

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @calaber24p/the-way-british-news-channels-are-covering-the-london-terrorist-attacks-are-100x-better-than-us-counterparts

· @redhens ·
I've been thinking a lot about why people treat violent acts by terrorists different than other forms of violence. In the US, a person can shoot up a movie theatre, or a Planned Parenthood clinic, or a Grade 1 classroom and nothing changes. But if a terrorist attack kills the same number or fewer, people are suddenly on board with refusing or evicting all refugees and banning travellers from entire countries and declaring war on all practitioners of an entire religion. 

Even here in Canada, people will worry about taking in refugees just in case there is a terrorist in the mix. "Better to be safe than sorry!" they say. But nobody shows that much interest in stopping domestic violence. Or repeat sex offenders. Or drunk drivers, all of whom are far more likely to harm us than terrorists.
properties (22)
post_id3,457,275
authorredhens
permlinkre-calaber24p-the-way-british-news-channels-are-covering-the-london-terrorist-attacks-are-100x-better-than-us-counterparts-20170606t032850216z
categorylife
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["life"]}"
created2017-06-06 03:28:51
last_update2017-06-06 03:28:51
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-06-13 03:28:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length797
author_reputation5,551,935,914,386
root_title"The Way British News Channels are Covering the London Terrorist Attacks are 100x Better Than US Counterparts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000