>"What about the forty thousand people who have survived? You continually ignore that this is not a typical influenza."

Vaccine trials don't vaccinate everyone.  

I don't forget that.  You constantly assume things due to your limited understanding, which impedes our ability to discuss things rationally.  Examples follow.

>"In essence what you people are trying to say is because on Dec 1 China implemented a mandatory vaccine regiment that thousands upon thousands of Chinese showed up in a extremely short period of time and got a shot based on scientific bad research over the years that clearly showed that you could not create a vaccine for a corona virus in the same manner as other influenza's as when done so it created a greater chance of lung deterioration via pneumonia's."

I'm going to take this bit by bit.

>"...you people..."

You're not replying to others but to me personally.  I hold my views because of my personal understanding I have developed through my personal research.  If you class me as a member of some group, quit replying to me, and address that community.  I am not part of some community other than Steem, informationwar, and palnet.  

The Dec 1 vaccine law is speculated to be a cause of increased vaccination - but we have no information that it was ever used to vaccinate anyone.  It's coincidence with the beginning of the epidemic is remarkable, so it's mentioned.

In fact, China did vaccinate people for SARS, and I have repeatedly linked proof to you stated in China Daily, which is an arm of the Chinese government - and that you have repeatedly ignored.  I submit that ignorance is no recommendation of rationality, or cause for agreement.

...scientific bad research...

What a crock!  Peer reviewed research that doesn't agree with your ignorant politics is called bad.  I could scarcely respect that opinion less.  If you're not going to bother to be rational, please go away.  I have undertaken to discuss these matters with you because I respect your voice.  If you're just going to ignore evidence, call the work of experienced professional scientists whose work has been reviewed by many other professional scientists who agree it is properly done 'bad' just because it doesn't support your ignorant politics, then I have no reason or purpose in spending time discussing any of this with you.

Keep your ignorant opinions to yourself.  I'm happy to seek to enlighten your nescience, because not knowing something is natural to all of us, and that's what people can do for each other.  But ignorance is seeking to remain nescient to prevent having to change your mind, and that is as useless as it is harmful to society.

I cannot respect it.

You have repeatedly called me a liar, and undertaken pejorative ad hominem attacks in your replies to me.  I have consistently provided proof of my claims, and been respectful in reply.  I have no reason to tolerate such bullshit from you or anyone else, and I'm done.

Either end your ad hominem attacks or GTFO.  Read the links I post to prove my claims, and quit saying I'm lying because you refuse to even look at the evidence in order to keep your political positions unchanged.  In fact it is you that is lying about 'bad science' 'antivaxxer conspiracy theories' and my own positions due to your deliberate ignorance and political incompetence that you seek to maintain for reasons of intellectual capacity.

Quit lying, or STFU.