Viewing a response to: @gandhibaba/steem-is-nothing-without-the-curators
Hi @gandhibaba It seem that almost every post you published is related strictly to Steem blockchain. You're relly seem to be deeply involved into this blockchain. Strong believer :) > The truth is that it will be impossible to reward content creators and even run the Steem blockchain had Steem not had a group of people who constantly defile the odds I actually wonder sometimes if advanced AI won't be doing way better job in rewarding quality content and active authors (comparing to humans). Luckily we're "safe" as long as we need to power up (pump real money) into this economy to have some "voice". That will surely be the only advantage over AI. Money and ownership (Which we have and AI doesn't). Anyway that's a totally different topic lol > there are still a couple of people out there who believe that curators are overrated and are getting too much for merely curating, for merely clicking the upvote button It would actually help to know how many people out there do manual curating and how many curators rely mostly on steemauto.com or other similar tools. I'm afraid that most curators do not care about manual curating. They care about maximizing their rewards (which means tons of small auto-upvotes at posts published by popular people). Good read. Upvoted already, Yours, Piotr
post_id | 81,068,130 |
---|---|
author | crypto.piotr |
permlink | pzpu2f |
category | newsteem |
json_metadata | {"users":["gandhibaba"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-21 08:25:27 |
last_update | 2019-10-21 08:25:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-28 08:25:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,305 |
author_reputation | 126,215,040,536,555 |
root_title | "Steem is Nothing Without the Curators" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
> It would actually help to know how many people out there do manual curating and how many curators rely mostly on steemauto.com or other similar tools. I'm afraid that most curators do not care about manual curating. They care about maximizing their rewards (which means tons of small auto-upvotes at posts published by popular people). I absolutely agree with you that manual curation is somewhat hard and tiring and it's why curators are doing what is only suitable - Steemauto. AI can help us discover quality posts that can then be curated by humans, good idea. Thanks for stopping by. PS: Lately I admit that I've been writing a lot about Steem. I'm very passionate about the power and possibilities on Steem.
post_id | 81,094,795 |
---|---|
author | gandhibaba |
permlink | pzrj6h |
category | newsteem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-22 06:25:33 |
last_update | 2019-10-22 06:25:33 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-29 06:25:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 719 |
author_reputation | 182,436,239,257,845 |
root_title | "Steem is Nothing Without the Curators" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |