I'm not sure if I've watched that one. I've seen some other things from Craig which I wasn't impressed with either. Feelings he had while looking at a waterfall, for example, doesn't qualify as evidence for a divine omnipotent entity.

Interesting <a href="https://www.quora.com/Who-won-the-debate-William-Lane-Craig-v-s-Sam-Harris-on-Are-the-foundations-of-moral-values-natural-or-supernatural">commentary on Quora</a>:

> I am, personally, a big fan of Sam Harris and anyone who closely follows him will tell you that this performance was very uncharacteristic. This more than likely had to do the formal debate format being relatively foreign for Harris and, in contrast, an obvious expertise of his opponent

Don't be too quick to judge Harris from this one performance. I think he has a large body of work that is very helpful for humanity for understanding morality.

Either way, the panel discussion I linked to in my post is much more balanced as far as "can science tell us right from wrong" as they have multiple perspectives from both sides of the issue. It's certainly not a theistic crowd though, so I don't think Craig supporters will appreciate the moments when the crowd cheers at comments made regarding the failures of religion concerning moral action.