RE: The Politics of Negative Voting by dana-edwards

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @venuspcs/re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160813t182953506z

· @dana-edwards · (edited)
Too much focus is on the dollar payout when what it's really about is the reputation, the Steem Power, the followers. People getting voted down for earning too much Steem Dollars on a particular post? What is it really about? It's about reputation and Steem Power which is long term commit to Steemit as a platform.

When you get a lot of votes from minnows what matters is whether or not these votes translate into followers. Over time the power of their votes could rise and you might not have to rely on votes from whales to get a decent sized payout in Steem Dollars. But on the same token, Steem Power is what you want to track to see whether it's being transferred from whales to everyone else.

There might be temporary marketing value in having dollar payouts on public display but I think we should have a debate on the merits of that UX feature.
properties (22)
post_id594,413
authordana-edwards
permlinkre-venuspcs-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t034216760z
categorypolitics
json_metadata"{"tags": ["politics"]}"
created2016-08-14 03:42:15
last_update2016-08-14 03:47:57
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-09-13 10:57:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length855
author_reputation348,515,599,824,762
root_title"The Politics of Negative Voting"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000