RE: The Politics of Negative Voting by dwinblood

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @l0k1/re-dwinblood-re-venuspcs-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t000909154z

· @dwinblood ·
You are correct.  Yet that is your opinion; one which I share.    Yet we would like this thing to take off like wild fire and the number one complaints you will see revolve in one way or another around money.   "They are paying that much for that crap!"   "I had X dollars and someone flagged me and I only have Y", to even people doing quite well complaining that  most of their posts are under $5 when I am fine with many of mine being zero and most under $1. :)    PERCEPTIONS do matter if we want mainstream adoption.   I have not personally been hit by the flag taking money issue.   I've seen it happen quite a few times though and that is with pretty smart people on here at the moment.   What happens when more and more of the status quo get on here.   It literally will be a shit storm unless we deal with it before then while we are in beta and we all are the test subjects.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id593,064
authordwinblood
permlinkre-l0k1-re-dwinblood-re-venuspcs-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t005256990z
categorypolitics
json_metadata"{"tags": ["politics"]}"
created2016-08-14 00:52:54
last_update2016-08-14 00:52:54
depth4
children1
net_rshares54,545,188
last_payout2016-09-13 10:57:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length884
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"The Politics of Negative Voting"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@l0k1 ·
People who whine about what other people get are not usually very creative or productive people anyway. Or at least they are missing the point of the addition of money into this system, which is really about making people think more about how they throw their votes about, and creating an opportunity cost to mitigate moral hazard, which includes sheepish behaviour, spamming, plagiarizing, etc. 'put your money where your mouth is' in my opinion sums up the key thing about Steemit. Clicks are cheap. But when they cost you money, you think a bit more about it. The same thing should apply to flagging as well. It should definitely cost to flag, quite a lot.
properties (22)
post_id593,712
authorl0k1
permlinkre-dwinblood-re-l0k1-re-dwinblood-re-venuspcs-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t020920039z
categorypolitics
json_metadata"{"tags": ["politics"]}"
created2016-08-14 02:09:21
last_update2016-08-14 02:09:21
depth5
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-09-13 10:57:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length659
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"The Politics of Negative Voting"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000