Viewing a response to: @venuspcs/re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160813t182953506z
> B. Any system where a post gets 100 up-votes and is still under $5 Payout is inherently flawed, IMHO. Just look at my Post History and you will understand why I say that. If there are that many people who like the content it should be paid a reasonable and fare rate. Which brings me to my next point. This I've witnessed before.
post_id | 589,920 |
---|---|
author | steemitqa |
permlink | re-venuspcs-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160813t194959274z |
category | politics |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["politics"]}" |
created | 2016-08-13 19:49:51 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:49:51 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 44,476,175,661 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 10:57:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.034 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 332 |
author_reputation | 22,967,361,763,386 |
root_title | "The Politics of Negative Voting" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
venuspcs | 0 | 44,476,175,661 | 100% |