Viewing a response to: @krishtopa/the-greatest-mathematical-paradox-ever
Thanks a lot Kate! I love the chips-and-hats example to introduce your post. Btw, a little typo: > Group 2: 287%(234/270) 287% is a bit too much ^^
| post_id | 800,810 |
|---|---|
| author | lemouth |
| permlink | re-krishtopa-the-greatest-mathematical-paradox-ever-20160830t132209686z |
| category | popularscience |
| json_metadata | "{"tags": ["popularscience"]}" |
| created | 2016-08-30 13:22:09 |
| last_update | 2016-08-30 13:22:09 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-30 10:43:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 151 |
| author_reputation | 178,283,483,453,967 |
| root_title | "The Greatest Mathematical Paradox Ever" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |