Viewing a response to: @krishtopa/the-greatest-mathematical-paradox-ever
My head starts spinning, trying to understand the first proposition. I get watchful when examples with high and seemingly randomly chosen numbers are used. It often is a way to camouflage a flaw in the argument. Just saying .-)
post_id | 799,109 |
---|---|
author | mandibil |
permlink | re-krishtopa-the-greatest-mathematical-paradox-ever-20160830t092203232z |
category | popularscience |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["popularscience"]}" |
created | 2016-08-30 09:22:00 |
last_update | 2016-08-30 09:22:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-30 10:43:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 227 |
author_reputation | 61,031,712,426,864 |
root_title | "The Greatest Mathematical Paradox Ever" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |