@themevlog Kavanaugh is not in a criminal hearing, therefore "evidence" is not truly necessary. This is rather a check on your character, and whether or not your "character" known as Judge Brett Kavanaugh is deemed worthy of a seat on the US Supreme Court bench. This being the highest court of law in the land, not only is your education and career considered for the life long job, but so is your overall character. Some might call this your "moral compass." 
Kavanaugh's display of insolence towards the committee when asked questioned he did not like for whatever reason, showed flaws in his character, especially for someone who most likely would have to confront tough and difficult situations as a member of the US Supreme Court.
When asked about his drinking, he was evasive, combative and at one point down right nasty. I would have preferred for him to have simply accepted that in college, like most young college frats, he and his friends partied hard. Because you would have to be in complete denial to not accept this, even if he hasn't. College is one long party for most frat boys, especially of privilege. 
But he didn't say that. Instead, the media has to find out that his " I like beer" was more like "I got stone cold drunk, started bar fights, and got friends arrested." I am sure that there are more College war stories that he doesn't want outed because of course it will reflect bad on his character, and just might, just might give more credence to Dr. Ford's and any other victims' stories. 

But in my book, his character has been proven flawed. The Federalist Society has a list of 24 other Great Judges that are of equal caliber to Brett Kavanaugh, why get stuck with this one?