Viewing a response to: @bendjmiller222/re-gavvet-is-there-a-scientific-basis-for-jesus-christ-20160731t182251737z
That's what it was like last time... lets see how it goes this time around... not much downvoting was required because the importance of reputation led to restraint and demonstrations of respect even where strong feelings were involved. I hope things haven't changed too much...
post_id | 376,067 |
---|---|
author | gavvet |
permlink | re-bendjmiller222-re-gavvet-is-there-a-scientific-basis-for-jesus-christ-20160731t183319537z |
category | religion |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["religion"]}" |
created | 2016-07-31 18:33:21 |
last_update | 2016-07-31 18:33:21 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 4,126,874,187 |
last_payout | 2016-08-31 05:46:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 278 |
author_reputation | 888,973,651,263,851 |
root_title | "Is there a scientific basis for Jesus Christ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bendjmiller222 | 0 | 4,126,874,187 | 100% |