RE: Partial Solution To Self-Upvote Stampede by ldauch

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @stellabelle/partial-solution-to-self-upvote-stampede

· @ldauch ·
I agree with this post but also have to wonder why is this even possible in the first place? Is this what the devs wanted or is it just an unexpected side effect or carelessness? Thanks for bringing this up.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id6,118,504
authorldauch
permlinkre-stellabelle-partial-solution-to-self-upvote-stampede-20170704t130512539z
categoryselfvotes
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["selfvotes"]}"
created2017-07-04 13:05:15
last_update2017-07-04 13:05:15
depth1
children1
net_rshares3,046,991,014
last_payout2017-07-11 13:05:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length207
author_reputation1,373,339,077,399
root_title"Partial Solution To Self-Upvote Stampede"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@stellabelle ·
no, the devs did not want this, that is why the curve was exponential. Before HF19, my vote was worth $3, and this prevented the type of abuse we are now seeing. Dan knew that people would do this, but the community wanted this changed. it has good and bad consequences.
properties (22)
post_id6,251,903
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-ldauch-re-stellabelle-partial-solution-to-self-upvote-stampede-20170705t175038425z
categoryselfvotes
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["selfvotes"]}"
created2017-07-05 17:50:39
last_update2017-07-05 17:50:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-12 17:50:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length270
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"Partial Solution To Self-Upvote Stampede"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000