RE: Partial Solution To Self-Upvote Stampede by marcusorlyius

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @bigfatmyths/re-marcusorlyius-re-stellabelle-partial-solution-to-self-upvote-stampede-20170703t174652102z

· @marcusorlyius ·
$0.02
Do you need a panel to decide whether "great post" or "I agree" comments are useless? No, of course you don't. In cases like that it's blatantly obvious that they add nothing to the discussion that an upvote does not and it's those post and those posts only which I'm talking about.

No it won't be hate speech next or anything else. What a strawman! If you have sex with a adult, what next? Sex with children?

If people are simply posting "Great post" rather than using the upvote button then they clearly don't have anything to say or add to the discussion and are just making steem worse for everyone who is actually interested in *using* the platform. If someone has nothing to say, how can they be censored?
👍  
properties (23)
post_id6,033,353
authormarcusorlyius
permlinkre-bigfatmyths-re-marcusorlyius-re-stellabelle-partial-solution-to-self-upvote-stampede-20170703t182816431z
categoryselfvotes
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["selfvotes"]}"
created2017-07-03 18:28:15
last_update2017-07-03 18:28:15
depth3
children0
net_rshares3,417,548,022
last_payout2017-07-10 18:28:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 SBD
curator_payout_value0.004 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length713
author_reputation152,132,577,106
root_title"Partial Solution To Self-Upvote Stampede"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)