RE: Thoughts on the Steem Economic Improvement Proposal (EIP) by ats-david

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @ocrdu/psl4hi

· @ats-david ·
>Delegations break the accountability and stake principle...

Yeah, I remember writing about that a year or so ago. It made no sense to me that you would create a DPoS blockchain, then essentially make that stake/influence transferable and usable to/for non-stakeholders. What did they expect the outcome would be? Certainly not *more* responsibility and accountability.

>I don't think anything in the EIP will help those who are just plodding along trying to make money with content...

Not directly, no. Indirectly through the increased value of STEEM, perhaps. That's the hope with increased incentives for holding SP and possibly reducing the influence of bid bots and the visibility of their "promoted" (and mostly terrible) content. But we'll see what happens.

>Outside of Steem(it), nobody has a clue what we're on about, so no effect there.

To be fair - not many on this platform have a clue either.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id75,877,595
authorats-david
permlinkpslxfq
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-06-05 03:52:39
last_update2019-06-05 03:52:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares11,390,171,183
last_payout2019-06-12 03:52:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length910
author_reputation298,156,611,743,534
root_title"Thoughts on the Steem Economic Improvement Proposal (EIP)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)