RE: Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes? by berniesanders

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @kryzsec/re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180803t011447836z

· @berniesanders ·
$0.08
It is not possible for me to get the votes required to be in the top 20.  Those whales would never consider voting for me regardless of how much I contribute, that's the unfortunate truth.
👍  , , , ,
👎  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id58,570,239
authorberniesanders
permlinkre-kryzsec-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180803t011756356z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-08-03 01:17:57
last_update2018-08-03 01:17:57
depth2
children3
net_rshares49,665,197,735
last_payout2018-08-10 01:17:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.065 SBD
curator_payout_value0.011 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length188
author_reputation604,103,165,045,172
root_title"Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@kryzsec ·
Well as I said with position 20 having only around double the amount of MVests backing him but way more voters, what if your platform was in search of getting as many people to vote for you (not just the whales). I mean I know that a few whales with a few GV each is better than a couple hundred minnows with MVests, but minnows (1 MV to ~100 MV for my definition) and dolphins (101 MV to 500 MV) have tons of unrest in regards to many or all of the whales.

I mean if you got 4000 more votes for witness and using the sigma of steempower is ~1000 with a mean of ~100 (78 but rounded to nearest 100 for as its all an approximation, calculated on old data unfortunately) and giving an approximation of proportion would give you another ~7.5 GV in votes.

I will redo the calculations with current data to make sure it is correct... and even exclude anyone that has voted for you and anyone over a certain size if you want but idk. Maybe it wouldn't work and you are right but I like to be optimistic that us smaller folk could elect witnesses that will actually fight the good fight.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id58,571,776
authorkryzsec
permlinkre-berniesanders-re-kryzsec-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180803t013923930z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-08-03 01:39:24
last_update2018-08-03 01:39:24
depth3
children0
net_rshares154,183,589
last_payout2018-08-10 01:39:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,082
author_reputation7,413,102,413,009
root_title"Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ssjsasha · (edited)
$0.09
back when @z8teyb289qav9z was voting for me I really gave a shit about this place, but never got around to actually voting, can I vote for @nextgencrypto more than once?
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id58,576,244
authorssjsasha
permlinkre-berniesanders-re-kryzsec-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180803t024927545z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"],"users":["z8teyb289qav9z","nextgencrypto"]}
created2018-08-03 02:49:00
last_update2018-08-03 02:49:12
depth3
children0
net_rshares57,169,055,209
last_payout2018-08-10 02:49:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.069 SBD
curator_payout_value0.019 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length169
author_reputation55,377,498,415,088
root_title"Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@gjones15 ·
Imo, this is the tragedy (and mistake) of the current system(regime).  I obviously don't know you personally, Mr. Sanders, but I've obviously seen you around.  And whether or not I or anyone else has always "agreed" with your... techniques, That is ABSOLUTELY beside the point--in fact, it is PRECISELY the reason you *should* be a witness.  Imo, someone who is willing to go against the grain and voice their opinion should be VALUED.  

In other words, in "my vision" of a truly decentralized (or at least more so than this) system, the "witnesses" will be an eclectic, *diverse* group--*and purposively so..* . Diversity, in other words, should be *sought*.  It's a shame what has seemingly happened to Steem/ steemit.  

But Who knows.  The structure is here--it's quite possible some "angel" could see the potential--something perhaps we or I do not atm--swoop-down and fix it all up again.  

I think I'll stick around for a bit :)
properties (22)
post_id58,762,412
authorgjones15
permlinkre-berniesanders-re-kryzsec-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180805t031750982z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-08-05 03:17:51
last_update2018-08-05 03:17:51
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-08-12 03:17:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length937
author_reputation1,227,125,239,851
root_title"Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000