RE: The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit) by bigsambucca

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @ats-david/re-timcliff-re-ats-david-re-timcliff-re-bigsambucca-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t064550829z

· @bigsambucca ·
If whales want to hold their votes then that is fine, but negating other whales votes is a misguided attempt at manipulation. People don't like to be manipulated and this also goes for the content creators who had no say in taking part in this, but are just being used. Its a failed experiment that was poorly planned and even more poorly executed. The sooner it stops the better.
properties (22)
post_id2,135,369
authorbigsambucca
permlinkre-ats-david-re-timcliff-re-ats-david-re-timcliff-re-bigsambucca-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t065001886z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-03-13 06:50:24
last_update2017-03-13 06:50:24
depth6
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-13 07:04:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length380
author_reputation22,675,431,258,708
root_title"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000