Viewing a response to: @abit/always-the-same-authors-on-trending
This "whales not voting" experiment has been great! I feel like the platform is actually starting to function like it was intended to. Except now people will be in for a shock if/when the experiment ends and their votes go back to being worthless lol. Do you feel like this experiment can run until some other solution is implemented... i.e. reward curve, capped voting power, etc.
post_id | 2,223,739 |
---|---|
author | dan-atstarlite |
permlink | re-abit-always-the-same-authors-on-trending-20170322t231134840z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-22 23:11:33 |
last_update | 2017-03-22 23:11:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 7,172,196,568,388 |
last_payout | 2017-04-23 05:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 7.549 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 2.264 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 381 |
author_reputation | 45,243,433,466,167 |
root_title | "Always the same authors on trending?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pfunk | 0 | 948,389,852,936 | 100% | ||
pairmike | 0 | 82,689,032,224 | 100% | ||
gavvet | 0 | 3,279,185,341,603 | 100% | ||
steve-walschot | 0 | 159,668,040,600 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 226,756,004,766 | 25% | ||
stellabelle | 0 | 1,519,224,762,287 | 100% | ||
kenny-crane | 0 | 76,599,335,122 | 100% | ||
mammasitta | 0 | 16,703,250,487 | 100% | ||
anyx | 0 | 319,041,474,938 | 100% | ||
steemit-life | 0 | 128,197,912,843 | 62% | ||
arcange | 0 | 50,645,912,474 | 100% | ||
deanliu | 0 | 57,363,447,536 | 100% | ||
dirty.hera | 0 | 111,584,442 | 100% | ||
ullikume | 0 | 12,333,653,113 | 100% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 53,041,050,309 | 100% | ||
lasseehlers | 0 | 34,686,249,990 | 100% | ||
l0k1 | 0 | 113,478,126,079 | 100% | ||
the-ego-is-you | 0 | 6,885,593,987 | 100% | ||
ebargains | 0 | 32,938,804,526 | 100% | ||
sjennon | 0 | 22,036,881,114 | 100% | ||
triverse | 0 | 3,442,481,802 | 100% | ||
reisman | 0 | 1,706,383,296 | 100% | ||
inber | 0 | 23,278,414,376 | 100% | ||
evildeathcore | 0 | 1,218,000,585 | 100% | ||
middle-theory | 0 | 2,574,976,953 | 25% |
This. Yes, it really does prove that the exaggerated power of the existing reward curve is deleterious to the community.
post_id | 2,223,784 |
---|---|
author | l0k1 |
permlink | re-dan-atstarlite-re-abit-always-the-same-authors-on-trending-20170322t231643541z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-22 23:16:45 |
last_update | 2017-03-22 23:16:45 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 1,633,086,432,109 |
last_payout | 2017-04-23 05:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.851 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.283 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 120 |
author_reputation | 94,769,080,451,415 |
root_title | "Always the same authors on trending?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
stellabelle | 0 | 1,519,224,762,287 | 100% | ||
kenny-crane | 0 | 76,599,335,122 | 100% | ||
the-ego-is-you | 0 | 6,885,593,987 | 100% | ||
personz | 0 | 28,629,662,461 | 100% | ||
cosmictriage | 0 | 1,747,078,252 | 100% |
n^1.1?
post_id | 2,224,093 |
---|---|
author | personz |
permlink | re-l0k1-re-dan-atstarlite-re-abit-always-the-same-authors-on-trending-20170323t001010869z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-23 00:10:09 |
last_update | 2017-03-23 00:10:09 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 102,017,190,450 |
last_payout | 2017-04-23 05:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.029 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.009 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 6 |
author_reputation | 42,440,234,781,798 |
root_title | "Always the same authors on trending?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kenny-crane | 0 | 76,599,335,122 | 100% | ||
social | 0 | 513,229,238 | 100% | ||
ender | 0 | 2,363,628,790 | 100% | ||
xwerk | 0 | 22,540,997,300 | 100% |
I couldn't agree more. I fear the day the experiment ends.....
post_id | 2,225,545 |
---|---|
author | stellabelle |
permlink | re-dan-atstarlite-re-abit-always-the-same-authors-on-trending-20170323t045134053z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-23 04:51:33 |
last_update | 2017-03-23 04:51:33 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 7,791,727,675 |
last_payout | 2017-04-23 05:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 62 |
author_reputation | 436,515,832,240,166 |
root_title | "Always the same authors on trending?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ambyr00 | 0 | 6,044,649,423 | 100% | ||
cosmictriage | 0 | 1,747,078,252 | 100% |