RE: Introducing Smackdown Kitty by dexter-k

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @l0k1/re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170702t174827306z

· @dexter-k ·
"I find it interesting as a contra #project-smackdown you need to say that you don't think your view is popular."

I said I know my view won't be popular "here" as in the context of this post and the ones who upvoted it.

"The flags the bot gives make next to no difference to rewards, except that as time goes on the percentage will rise until it hits 100%"

To me this is the equivalent of someone slapping me just a little bit harder every time I tell them that I disagree with them, and eventually the make a fist. Why not just make a fist from the very get go? Or better yet, use the book of steem according to you to thump them with?

"It shouldn't be intimidating if your position really is that strong in your own mind."

I don't think I ever said that I was intimidated?

"Dogma means ignoring the natural laws and fighting people for questioning it"

A dogma is a set of guiding principals or tenets that a group adheres to, usually having to do with morals or faith, and usually in fear of punishment. I believe you are trying to force what you believe to be virtuous principals onto those who don't agree with your viewpoint, and if they disagree or run counter to your principals, you will use your bot to punish them. You say you are playing, and you are finding incredible satisfaction in it, but I don't view being punished by someone who has a different opinion than me as playing, and I doubt many will.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id5,917,770
authordexter-k
permlinkre-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170702t182238469z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["project-smackdown", "steem"]}"
created2017-07-02 18:22:42
last_update2017-07-02 18:22:42
depth3
children15
net_rshares211,410,216
last_payout2017-07-09 18:22:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,421
author_reputation54,255,584,238,995
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@l0k1 · (edited)
If the idea that self-aggrandizement and conceit are positive attributes and behaviour in a person is your position, then sure. Self-vote away.

Meanwhile, in the real world of every type of science and knowledge, no claims originating from the inventor of an idea about its effects can be accepted as useful theory to develop a technology from.

There is a lot of bad people in the world, and one of the things that is common amongst all evil is the key characteristic of Psychopathy - Narcissism.

At this point I expect the barb that I am being egotistical by saying that I know better than you.

Well, I hate to break it to you, but in the real world there is this thing called 'facts'. These facts do not depend on your, or my, or anyone's opinions. I am not interested in representing opinions about anything without a way to show that there may be, or is FACTS backing up my viewpoint. If I don't think I have a logical foundation to what I am saying, I will tell you.

Yes, what I say, about myself, is as meaningless as a self vote.

Let that sink in for a while.

Oh, and by the way, I don't fear punishment. I fear not understanding the rules of the system I am interacting with.

Go outside and find a 2 foot drop, close your eyes, and step over it. Do you want to live your life in fear that you cannot see the ground in front of you? There is an easy solution. Doubt yourself.

I doubt myself almost at least 20 times a day. I depend on this to make sure I am checking up on the world around me. I have fallen into a blissful state of satisfaction too many times and then smashed my head on something, literally, more times than I can remember. I probably smack my head jumping up without looking first, at least once a week, at certain times, I remember days when I just didn't seem to be able to avoid smashing into the sharpest possible corners that I could have.

I take no insult in any expression of doubt about my capacities. You don't know me, or very much of my history. I doubt everything, until I see at least 3 things that are coherent with the initial suspicion. But I also don't wait for 100% certainty. I don't believe it is possible to be that confident. I act, at the moment that my gut, and my mind, are telling me that the ground is shifting. I get better at this the longer I live.

But don't take my word for it. Test me. I invite it.
properties (22)
post_id5,918,259
authorl0k1
permlinkre-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170702t182743604z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-02 18:27:48
last_update2017-07-02 18:33:09
depth4
children14
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-09 18:27:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length2,369
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@dexter-k ·
$0.21
I never said that the idea that self-aggrandizement and conceit are positive attributes, but that is obviously contrary to your moral stance, good for you.

I never claimed to know anything about science, knowledge, evil or bad people, psychopathy or narcissism, but again, if you do, good for you. 

I don't care about what facts you have learned in whatever books you have read, I doubt you have taken the time to research every argument about every fact in every book you have ever read. Your egotism doesn't come from thinking you know more than me, it comes from thinking that you, and your facts, are correct. 

I don't think what you say, about yourself, is as meaningless as a self vote, I think it has much much less meaning, let that sink in for a while.

I don't care what you do or do not fear, I care about other people trying to force their viewpoint (whether it is based on facts or not) onto a person who disagrees.

I don't know what all that stuff about stepping off of curbs with your eyes closed and constantly bashing your head into things has to do with anything that I have said, but I think it's stupid and reckless to not look before you leap, and I don't think it fits in with your apparent affinity for facts. I don't live my life in fear, and I don't doubt myself. I don't care what you think is possible or how you act according to your gut and mind, but I'm glad you are getting better at it. 

I don't understand what you mean by asking me to test you.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id5,921,324
authordexter-k
permlinkre-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170702t190205053z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-02 19:02:09
last_update2017-07-02 19:02:09
depth5
children6
net_rshares28,949,673,013
last_payout2017-07-09 19:02:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.160 SBD
curator_payout_value0.048 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,483
author_reputation54,255,584,238,995
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@l0k1 ·
7 paragraphs denying everything.

Good, at least you are not certain. But you should at least understand that you have to act, the clock ticks, and the resources slowly drain away.

It is reckless to leap before you look. It took me almost 40 years to learn that lesson. But it is foolish to stand still when the wind is blowing to favour after the pressure drops and your opportunity has come.
properties (22)
post_id5,922,693
authorl0k1
permlinkre-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170702t191736018z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-02 19:17:39
last_update2017-07-02 19:17:39
depth6
children5
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-09 19:17:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length394
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@lexiconical ·
*"no claims originating from the inventor of an idea about its effects can be accepted as useful theory to develop a technology from."*

On what possible basis, and with what evidence, can you make this claim? It sounds ludicrous. It would literally call for ignoring Einstein on E=mc^2.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id6,411,435
authorlexiconical
permlinkre-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170707t051644771z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-07 05:16:57
last_update2017-07-07 05:16:57
depth5
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 05:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length287
author_reputation182,903,586,801,459
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@elfspice ·
$0.04
I forgot to put 'solely' to qualify this. Of course an inventor makes claims about their invention. But I dunno what rock you have been living under if you never heard the term 'Snake Oil Salesman'.

You are just trolling, anyway, so I'll give it the due regard with a special button called 'mute'. Splitting hairs in order to enable a criticism that omits an important and clear point that was taken out of context is an example of a logical fallacy and a logical fallacy does not stand up in a debate being conducted according to the long established rules of logic.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id6,411,866
authorelfspice
permlinkre-lexiconical-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170707t052329605z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-07 05:23:33
last_update2017-07-07 05:23:33
depth6
children1
net_rshares9,579,420,932
last_payout2017-07-14 05:23:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.032 SBD
curator_payout_value0.010 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length568
author_reputation-3,991,270,030,659
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@secondstar ·
"self-aggrandizement and conceit" such as deciding that people who don't use SteemIt the way you want them to use it deserve "your" punishment?  And then to go and create a bot to automate this punishment based on a set of rules you devised, outside of the rules of the system?

You've appointed yourself judge, jury, and executioner mate... leaves no room to talk about others participating in self-aggrandizing and conceited behavior.
properties (22)
post_id9,978,966
authorsecondstar
permlinkre-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170812t213152211z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-08-12 21:31:54
last_update2017-08-12 21:31:54
depth5
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-08-19 21:31:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length436
author_reputation560,904,454,314
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@l0k1 · (edited)
hey, i left that project as soon as a whale joined to fund it, and this whale couldn't believe that Dan was self upvoting to promote his jibber jabber. I'd seen it long before that but nobody I talked to remembered it. Doesn't mean it didn't happen and the fact it repeated says a lot.

So in fact, I did no judging, jurying or execution, it was other people.

And who exactly is qualified anyway? I think it should be a community thing. But that's not possible because of the distorted stakes of the whales who got their stake by mining before anyone knew there was a steem at all.

The most vicious vigilantes on this platform are actually @ned, @dan, @berniesanders, and others whose accounts you will be able to identify by being created before april last year.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id10,011,919
authorl0k1
permlinkre-secondstar-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-re-dexter-k-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170813t092152683z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["ned", "dan", "berniesanders"], "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-08-13 09:21:51
last_update2017-08-13 09:24:54
depth6
children2
net_rshares2,489,185,751
last_payout2017-08-20 09:21:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length765
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)