RE: Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes? by gjones15

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @beggars/re-berniesanders-re-alainite-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180803t013419207z

· @gjones15 ·
Thank you for this.  And thank you bernie for pointing this out.  Witness discussion/ "promotion" transparency/ data,  should be on the top priority-list for steemit.  It's kind of a strange paradox of "decentralization--" things can become very insular, making dissemination of information diffcult--all the while, a blockchain, by its very design--ensures some form of "solidarity" or uniformity "across all nodes" (as has been explained above--if I 'm understanidng correctly).  This, imo, is the problem with DPOS.  At least with EOS they *kind of* seemed to have some sort of "voting"/ procedure to determine block producers--although I could only imagine what a put-on all that could have been.  Unfortunately, I'm not close enough to the tech to truly know.  But I'm doing my best to learn.
properties (22)
post_id58,763,098
authorgjones15
permlinkre-beggars-re-berniesanders-re-alainite-re-berniesanders-why-aren-t-more-of-the-top-witnesses-running-supporting-full-nodes-20180805t032944398z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-08-05 03:29:45
last_update2018-08-05 03:29:45
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-08-12 03:29:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length797
author_reputation1,227,125,239,851
root_title"Why aren't more of the top witnesses running/supporting full nodes?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000