RE: The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit) by hagbardceline

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit

steem · @hagbardceline · Mar 13 '17

$0.18

I don't understand why this experiment is being conducted. The source code of Steemit is open for everyone to see. We all KNOW what happens when all whales decide to stop voting. Why do we need an experiment to find out about something we already know?

👍 ats-david, gamer00, neptun, thylbom, bacchist, l0k1, tee-em, timcliff, writingamigo, ebargains, greymass, supergoodliving, littlescribe, surpassinggoogle, burnin, xtrodinarypilot, patelincho, ambyr00, bestoftherest, ninkhisibir, hisnameisolllie, abcd, pangur-ban, reisman, tonylondon, steemradio, evildeathcore, escrow, tamersameeh, benjiparler, steemspeak, dirty.hera, emeka, michaelnonso, mestyz, marjuki95, kamidela

`post_id`	2,135,959
`author`	hagbardceline
`permlink`	re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t091423641z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2017-03-13 09:14:24
`last_update`	2017-03-13 09:14:24
`depth`	1
`children`	6
`net_rshares`	1,494,093,227,305
`last_payout`	2017-04-13 07:04:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.133 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.043 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	252
`author_reputation`	9,332,543,007,969
`root_title`	"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (37)

voter	rshares	pct
abcd	2,813,822,568	100%
escrow	662,451,241	100%
hisnameisolllie	3,658,966,710	100%
pangur-ban	2,505,554,419	100%
tee-em	72,677,077,645	100%
bacchist	118,896,483,572	100%
thylbom	141,810,102,328	100%
greymass	32,138,439,751	100%
dirty.hera	167,373,543	100%
timcliff	39,898,891,105	20%
steemradio	830,391,553	100%
neptun	184,533,230,244	100%
ats-david	330,358,202,166	100%
l0k1	107,469,464,218	100%
ebargains	33,873,076,285	100%
patelincho	7,779,631,935	100%
littlescribe	18,401,879,197	100%
burnin	14,321,457,160	100%
bestoftherest	4,708,225,427	100%
surpassinggoogle	14,712,774,584	100%
ninkhisibir	3,790,504,001	100%
gamer00	269,989,276,052	100%
supergoodliving	31,238,739,723	100%
steemspeak	179,273,488	0.01%
reisman	1,946,200,025	100%
writingamigo	36,075,459,022	100%
tamersameeh	590,072,661	100%
tonylondon	900,917,843	100%
michaelnonso	129,973,359	100%
benjiparler	414,094,549	100%
mestyz	91,166,559	100%
emeka	136,168,027	100%
xtrodinarypilot	9,507,051,465	100%
ambyr00	6,032,532,909	100%
kamidela	51,026,950	100%
evildeathcore	736,327,111	100%
marjuki95	66,947,910	100%

@timcliff · Mar 13 '17

> We all KNOW what happens when all whales decide to stop voting. 

Explain

properties (22)

`post_id`	2,138,760
`author`	timcliff
`permlink`	re-hagbardceline-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t163041170z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2017-03-13 16:30:39
`last_update`	2017-03-13 16:30:39
`depth`	2
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-04-13 07:04:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	75
`author_reputation`	262,354,724,187,317
`root_title`	"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@hagbardceline · Mar 13 '17

$0.03

Well, the votes of minnows and dolphins count more. Surprise! ;-)

👍 gamer00, timcliff, ambyr00

`post_id`	2,141,767
`author`	hagbardceline
`permlink`	re-timcliff-re-hagbardceline-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t223507147z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2017-03-13 22:35:06
`last_update`	2017-03-13 22:35:06
`depth`	3
`children`	4
`net_rshares`	292,686,458,319
`last_payout`	2017-04-13 07:04:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.020 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.006 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	65
`author_reputation`	9,332,543,007,969
`root_title`	"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
timcliff	39,926,331,304	20%
gamer00	249,743,683,284	100%
ambyr00	3,016,443,731	100%

@timcliff · Mar 14 '17

That is true. There are other factors to consider too though - the price of STEEM, user engagement, curation rewards for dolphins/minnows. If anything, the experiment should be fun for the 'little people' once the drama over all the downvotes settles.

properties (22)

`post_id`	2,142,332
`author`	timcliff
`permlink`	re-hagbardceline-re-timcliff-re-hagbardceline-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170314t000402336z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2017-03-14 00:04:00
`last_update`	2017-03-14 00:04:00
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-04-13 07:04:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	251
`author_reputation`	262,354,724,187,317
`root_title`	"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

3 replies