RE: Introducing Smackdown Kitty by l0k1

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @remlaps/re-personz-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170629t215927923z

· @l0k1 ·
$0.15
Self voting is spam, as far as the central purpose of Steem goes - rewarding content that is highly regarded. People only do it because button.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id5,616,363
authorl0k1
permlinkre-remlaps-re-personz-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170630t021615589z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-06-30 02:16:15
last_update2017-06-30 02:16:15
depth6
children6
net_rshares17,989,000,220
last_payout2017-07-07 02:16:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.116 SBD
curator_payout_value0.038 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length143
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@remlaps ·
$0.32
I disagree with this as a blanket statement.  Yes, sometimes it is true, but often, it's not.  It depends on where the vote is placed.  You need to know more about the post/comment to know whether it was spam or not.

For example:

My 15 year old son, @cmp2020, has studied piano for the last 6 or 7 years, and music theory for the last year.  When he posts on those topics, his self-vote is far more valuable than many other votes in conveying information to the system.  Similarly, at a higher order, @lemouth is a particle physicist and @justtryme90 is a biologist.  If they want to promote their own comments to the top of a discussion in their area of expertise,  they should certainly be able to.

I'm sure that almost everyone  on steemit has specialized knowledge on some topic or other, where their own self-vote should carry more weight than the vote of a random person who happens to see the post/comment.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id5,794,938
authorremlaps
permlinkre-l0k1-re-remlaps-re-personz-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170701t161046844z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["cmp2020", "lemouth", "justtryme90"], "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-01 16:10:48
last_update2017-07-01 16:10:48
depth7
children5
net_rshares38,317,683,729
last_payout2017-07-08 16:10:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.240 SBD
curator_payout_value0.079 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length916
author_reputation294,366,842,111,471
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@l0k1 ·
$0.17
I think the number of users now has led to a place where there is an audience for every niche. This argument steadily becomes more invalid.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id5,795,282
authorl0k1
permlinkre-remlaps-re-l0k1-re-remlaps-re-personz-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170701t161415839z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-01 16:14:18
last_update2017-07-01 16:14:18
depth8
children4
net_rshares20,493,529,345
last_payout2017-07-08 16:14:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.158 SBD
curator_payout_value0.010 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length139
author_reputation94,769,080,451,415
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@remlaps ·
As long as non-experts are able to vote on comments and posts of all topics, the argument will remain valid.  You can't assume that all of the people voting are the ones with expertise.
properties (22)
post_id5,796,127
authorremlaps
permlinkre-l0k1-re-remlaps-re-l0k1-re-remlaps-re-personz-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-re-ocrdu-re-l0k1-introducing-smackdown-kitty-20170701t162228771z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-01 16:22:30
last_update2017-07-01 16:22:30
depth9
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-08 16:22:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length185
author_reputation294,366,842,111,471
root_title"Introducing Smackdown Kitty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000