RE: Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM! by meesterboom

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @schattenjaeger/why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem

· @meesterboom · (edited)
$0.10
I know that people have to power down at some points but I agree, it's a bit annoying to see regular dumpers of steem keep creaming in the rewards. 

I wish there was more of a community of low/middle holders of steem. It just seems that the pump last year was too great a lure for lots of folk and they dumped all/half/three quarters of their holdings. I once swam (as it were) with a shoal of similar sp holders. I am the only one left after last year's pump. 

I do wish that there wasn't such a contempt for content creators at times. The focus is all *look at the dapps* and how we (content creators) are fucked. I think content creators are just as important as a bunch of folk using different dapps.

Not sure if I have added anything or just whined, lol

And yeah, @whatsup is a lady? This is madness! :0)
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id64,819,911
authormeesterboom
permlinkre-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t052655973z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","users":["whatsup"],"tags":["steem"]}
created2018-10-24 05:26:57
last_update2018-10-24 05:28:33
depth1
children2
net_rshares88,095,260,415
last_payout2018-10-31 05:26:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.075 SBD
curator_payout_value0.023 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length813
author_reputation823,295,147,248,484
root_title"Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@snubbermike ·
I don't think that content creators and dapp developers have to be mutually exclusive.

I believe (or hope) that there is still a lot of overlap where everyone can still access a share of the rewards pool.  I really don't think that content creators are going to be fucked.

Ultimately, popularity and social activity will always play a part in the rewards distribution.  And there will always be people interested in the writing, photography, videos, etc, that are found here.

Especially if you can build a community among your followers.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id64,820,666
authorsnubbermike
permlinkre-meesterboom-re-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t054558533z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
created2018-10-24 05:46:00
last_update2018-10-24 05:46:00
depth2
children1
net_rshares7,806,008,463
last_payout2018-10-31 05:46:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length540
author_reputation7,683,437,369,949
root_title"Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@meesterboom ·
I agree with that, I think there is room for all and for many an overlap because I know for one that I don't want to be stuck in just one niche.

It's jut not the first time I have read a post decrying content creators as if they are the enemy sometimes. Which is odd.

Building a cmmunity is important. What often counts though is them not fucking off at the first sign of Steem breaking two dollars :OD
👍  
properties (23)
post_id64,820,847
authormeesterboom
permlinkre-snubbermike-re-meesterboom-re-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t055012674z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
created2018-10-24 05:50:15
last_update2018-10-24 05:50:15
depth3
children0
net_rshares7,798,670,755
last_payout2018-10-31 05:50:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length404
author_reputation823,295,147,248,484
root_title"Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)