RE: @Whales, @Witnesses, We have to talk! by mobbs

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @transisto/whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk

· @mobbs · (edited)
$0.60
My idea to solve both spam and vote buying is to encourage those like @blocktrades and @minnowbooster, even @berniesanders if he needs a new direction, to change their business model. Instead, delegate to trusted curation teams like OCD, Steemstem, steemiteducation, some of the country-based ones and so forth, who will then do the quality curating with that SP, thus boosting the minnows and reducing spam ability/incentive

To get an ROI, they could offer a premium where any user can send a small payment to prioritize viewing of their posts (but not guaranteeing an upvote). There are enough people in these teams to cover most tags and can always recruit more.

Convincing a few whales would be a far easier solution than changing the framework of steemit via hardforks and the like, and they'd still profit if done right
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id17,928,898
authormobbs
permlinkre-transisto-whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk-20171117t072624582z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["blocktrades", "minnowbooster", "berniesanders"], "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-11-17 07:26:21
last_update2017-11-17 07:31:24
depth1
children0
net_rshares279,437,772,441
last_payout2017-11-24 07:26:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.538 SBD
curator_payout_value0.064 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length827
author_reputation85,331,840,145,173
root_title"@Whales, @Witnesses, We have to talk!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)