RE: The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit) by nanzo-scoop

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-nanzo-scoop-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t011845500z

· @nanzo-scoop ·
$0.02
Counter voting for the purpose of this experiment is a terrible idea. As most authors won't get the memo nor care, they'll just see the downvotes and the zapping of rewards that could have been.

I'm not sure what the data of dolphins being the new whales will show. It certainly wouldn't show the likely impact of limiting voting vests.

But oh well... let's see how this pans out.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,134,281
authornanzo-scoop
permlinkre-timcliff-re-nanzo-scoop-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t012901305z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-03-13 01:29:03
last_update2017-03-13 01:29:03
depth3
children0
net_rshares220,156,203,901
last_payout2017-04-13 07:04:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 SBD
curator_payout_value0.003 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length382
author_reputation301,223,526,692,484
root_title"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)