Viewing a response to: @nanzo-scoop/re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t011455660z
Wow. This guy gets it. This "experiment" cannot even be called an experiment because it has biased itself out the gate. Abit doesnt understand this. Unfortunately so.
| post_id | 2,134,683 |
|---|---|
| author | officialfuzzy |
| permlink | re-nanzo-scoop-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t031717708z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-03-13 03:17:21 |
| last_update | 2017-03-13 03:17:21 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-13 07:04:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 168 |
| author_reputation | 386,070,543,215,380 |
| root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |