Viewing a response to: @tcpolymath/re-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t032315089z
Good feedback. Though Iโd say that, ultimately, HF20 was a good thing and weโre in a better place now. Yeah, the implementation was rough, but the end result is a big positive.
post_id | 64,815,765 |
---|---|
author | schattenjaeger |
permlink | re-tcpolymath-re-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t032625538z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2018-10-24 03:26:24 |
last_update | 2018-10-24 03:26:24 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 23,656,743,535 |
last_payout | 2018-10-31 03:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.020 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.006 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 178 |
author_reputation | 133,181,666,357,162 |
root_title | "Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fulltimegeek | 0 | 23,656,743,535 | 1% |
Technologically that may be true - though there are still some interesting emergent behaviors happening around the early vote penalty - but philosophically it very much isn't. We learned a bunch of scary things from the hardfork process: - Loss of user assets is not sufficient reason to roll back an update. - Code review and testing was woefully incomplete, and that incompleteness was kept secret - and the top witness in the best position of anyone to know that was spending his time trying to pump the price instead. - Steemit Inc.'s development process ignores user experience at every stage, and they seem to be fine with that. - The elected representatives of the user base make decisions in secret meetings in a private discussion forum. Apart from some efforts on the code front by mid-tier witnesses, none of this has been addressed, and each of them on its own is very much a "run" signal to me. I'm trying to be patient about wanting to see some movement on these issues, but we're getting to the point where it's not looking good.
post_id | 64,817,146 |
---|---|
author | tcpolymath |
permlink | re-schattenjaeger-re-tcpolymath-re-schattenjaeger-why-buy-steem-and-why-buy-steem-20181024t040459333z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2018-10-24 04:05:00 |
last_update | 2018-10-24 04:05:00 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 244,075,846,188 |
last_payout | 2018-10-31 04:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.209 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.067 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,046 |
author_reputation | 72,815,229,425,615 |
root_title | "Why Buy STEEM? And Why Buy STEEM!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fulltimegeek | 0 | 142,175,539,073 | 6% | ||
ats-david | 0 | 28,855,597,314 | 100% | ||
ocrdu | 0 | 894,726,208 | 100% | ||
mariusjuk | 0 | 72,149,983,593 | 100% |