Viewing a response to: @stellabelle/re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170111t021615375z
Yes, that is precisely what I mean. If visitors/readers are 100%, commenters are 10%, and posters are 1%. That's true for all of these types of sites: Medium, Reddit, Disqus, et c. Regardless of the rewards, we are always going to have vastly more commenters than posters. It's a lot easier to reply to someone else (even with a "hey, you're WRONG!") than it is to type something new and interesting into an empty editor box. PS: Who told you this is a blogging site? :)
| post_id | 1,732,786 |
|---|---|
| author | sneak |
| permlink | re-stellabelle-re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170111t025543429z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-01-11 02:54:42 |
| last_update | 2017-01-11 02:54:42 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 2 |
| net_rshares | 14,565,742,245 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-10 22:33:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 475 |
| author_reputation | 27,542,287,033,381 |
| root_title | "Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crok | 0 | 5,007,488,560 | 100% | ||
| bitcoinparadise | 0 | 9,558,253,685 | 100% |
> something new and interesting into an empty editor box. gulaabee havaee jahaaj เคเฅเคฒเคพเคฌเฅ เคนเคตเคพเค เคเคนเคพเค > PS: Who told you this is a blogging site? :) I now understand why your username is _sneak_.
| post_id | 1,732,904 |
|---|---|
| author | stellabelle |
| permlink | re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170111t032445082z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-01-11 03:24:45 |
| last_update | 2017-01-11 03:24:45 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-10 22:33:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 195 |
| author_reputation | 436,515,832,240,166 |
| root_title | "Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
This is why ACTUALLY reading the content and commenting is just as valuable as creating posts if not more valuable. I am a little weary on the removal of the 4 post limit. I think that will open the door for people to start playing the numbers game and put out as much posts as they can and see how many "hits" they get. I don't see this adding value to Steemit but decreasing it.
| post_id | 1,733,509 |
|---|---|
| author | bitcoinparadise |
| permlink | re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-sneak-re-stellabelle-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170111t061615712z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-01-11 06:16:12 |
| last_update | 2017-01-11 06:16:12 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-10 22:33:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 382 |
| author_reputation | 52,885,100,418,823 |
| root_title | "Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |