Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-abit-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t163448405z
Isn't the simplest way to answer that question. 1. Draw a line on what is considered a whale. 2. Calculate the total upvote stake weight, then subtract the amount contributed by those accounts above the line considered a whale. (This is the amount you must effectively downvote) 3. Apply a definitive downvote equal to the amount worked out above. /edit 1 There need not be any subjectivity if we are to achieve desirable experimental results. Experiments must have known and controlled parameters so that we can test the variable(s). It is my belief, that if we are to conduct this experiment properly, then the line must be drawn clearly, and downvotes applied correctly without subjectivity.
post_id | 2,140,841 |
---|---|
author | sweetsssj |
permlink | re-timcliff-re-abit-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t202930407z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-13 20:29:33 |
last_update | 2017-03-13 20:34:18 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 4,172,427,818,963 |
last_payout | 2017-04-13 07:04:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.550 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.183 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 701 |
author_reputation | 477,407,116,864,047 |
root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
onceuponatime | 0 | 4,125,572,222,805 | 100% | ||
timcliff | 0 | 39,926,331,304 | 20% | ||
the-ego-is-you | 0 | 6,749,991,366 | 100% | ||
steemspeak | 0 | 179,273,488 | 0.01% |
It's a work in progress.
post_id | 2,142,315 |
---|---|
author | timcliff |
permlink | re-sweetsssj-re-timcliff-re-abit-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170314t000051982z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-14 00:00:51 |
last_update | 2017-03-14 00:00:51 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-13 07:04:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 24 |
author_reputation | 262,354,724,187,317 |
root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Well said. Thanks.
post_id | 2,145,901 |
---|---|
author | abit |
permlink | re-sweetsssj-re-timcliff-re-abit-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170314t121322204z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-14 12:14:30 |
last_update | 2017-03-14 12:14:30 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-13 07:04:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 18 |
author_reputation | 111,629,191,115,088 |
root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |