RE: @Whales, @Witnesses, We have to talk! by thatsweeneyguy

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @hassanabid/re-lays-re-transisto-whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk-20171117t140650734z

· @thatsweeneyguy ·
$0.10
Those who *pay* for delegations just to profit are gaming the system. The "spirit" of the platform, as explained by the original steem whitepaper, speaks of creating algorithms that would *prevent* gaming the system. 

When buying SP, you're kind of expected to use it altruistically. It's not so YOU can earn more money, it's so you can GIVE more money, by voting on content that you deem valuable. 

There's a big misunderstanding about the idea of "there are no rules here". Just because the system doesn't *prevent* one from doing something, doesn't make it any less rude. 

And yes, self-upvoting by whales is a huge problem too, but that's not what this post is about.
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id18,162,716
authorthatsweeneyguy
permlinkre-hassanabid-re-lays-re-transisto-whales-witnesses-we-have-to-talk-20171119t205632453z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-11-19 20:56:33
last_update2017-11-19 20:56:33
depth3
children0
net_rshares41,934,394,571
last_payout2017-11-26 20:56:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.075 SBD
curator_payout_value0.020 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length674
author_reputation10,471,285,480,508
root_title"@Whales, @Witnesses, We have to talk!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)