Viewing a response to: @fuzzyvest/re-timcliff-re-officialfuzzy-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t170833391z
No worries. IMO the communication part _really_ sucked. At the very least if all the whales had been contacted ahead of time, and there was a heads up to the community as far as what they were doing and why - it would have gone a **lot** smoother.
post_id | 2,140,653 |
---|---|
author | timcliff |
permlink | re-fuzzyvest-re-timcliff-re-officialfuzzy-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t200629083z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-03-13 20:06:30 |
last_update | 2017-03-13 20:06:30 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 832,539,512,048 |
last_payout | 2017-04-13 07:04:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.086 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 247 |
author_reputation | 262,354,724,187,317 |
root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fuzzyvest | 0 | 832,539,512,048 | 21% |