RE: The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit) by timcliff

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @fuzzyvest/re-timcliff-re-officialfuzzy-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t170833391z

· @timcliff ·
$0.09
No worries. IMO the communication part _really_ sucked. At the very least if all the whales had been contacted ahead of time, and there was a heads up to the community as far as what they were doing and why - it would have gone a **lot** smoother.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,140,653
authortimcliff
permlinkre-fuzzyvest-re-timcliff-re-officialfuzzy-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170313t200629083z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-03-13 20:06:30
last_update2017-03-13 20:06:30
depth4
children0
net_rshares832,539,512,048
last_payout2017-04-13 07:04:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.086 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length247
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)