Viewing a response to: @phillycheeze/re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170401t201400620z
It is not about taking rewards away from people. One of the biggest issues that has been affecting user retention has been the fact that regular users have no say over the payout of rewards, and the only way to earn is to be one of the lucky ones that a whale pays attention to. The goal of what @abit is doing is to counter the influence from the whales that are still voting, so that the voting from the 'regular' users of the platform actually matter.
post_id | 2,315,848 |
---|---|
author | timcliff |
permlink | re-phillycheeze-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170401t205407511z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["abit"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
created | 2017-04-01 20:54:06 |
last_update | 2017-04-01 20:54:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-08 20:54:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 454 |
author_reputation | 262,354,724,187,317 |
root_title | "The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |