RE: The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit) by timcliff

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @phillycheeze/re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170401t201400620z

· @timcliff ·
It is not about taking rewards away from people. One of the biggest issues that has been affecting user retention has been the fact that regular users have no say over the payout of rewards, and the only way to earn is to be one of the lucky ones that a whale pays attention to. The goal of what @abit is doing is to counter the influence from the whales that are still voting, so that the voting from the 'regular' users of the platform actually matter.
properties (22)
post_id2,315,848
authortimcliff
permlinkre-phillycheeze-re-timcliff-the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit-20170401t205407511z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["abit"], "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-04-01 20:54:06
last_update2017-04-01 20:54:06
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-08 20:54:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length454
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"The Whale Voting Experiment Explained (including downvotes from @abit)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000