Viewing a response to: @dantheman/re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170224t221437083z
You are no doubt right. My intention with this post was instead to the address the lack of trust between the two projects (and indeed, in the broader crypto community). I think we can do better than we're doing.
| post_id | 2,038,959 |
|---|---|
| author | watervapor |
| permlink | re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170225t071502092z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-02-25 07:15:12 |
| last_update | 2017-02-25 07:15:12 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 5 |
| net_rshares | 402,947,892,289 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 211 |
| author_reputation | 37,631,848,837 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tuck-fheman | 0 | 402,947,892,289 | 100% |
I think the way in which we could do better is to all stop making excuses for @faddat's unwarranted tantrums and mudslinging. The code is there for him to review, and all the demands he was making could have been resolved by him taking 5 minutes to read it. (He even had three experienced devs helping him in the comments in the linked thread.) Instead, he chose to (in order): assign blame, be passive aggressive, play the victim, and then speculate about malice—without basis. We are all now aware of how productive these behaviors turned out to be. He shouldn't have to speculate very much more to figure out why he is unwelcome in our Slack. We welcome constructive feedback, positive *and* negative. This wasn't that. We are a very small team and reading and responding to this sort of toxic behavior has tangible effects on our productivity.
| post_id | 2,039,166 |
|---|---|
| author | sneak |
| permlink | re-watervapor-re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170225t083714770z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["faddat"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-02-25 08:37:15 |
| last_update | 2017-02-25 09:12:48 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 4 |
| net_rshares | 1,067,364,257,321 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.077 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.008 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 852 |
| author_reputation | 27,542,287,033,381 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| roelandp | 0 | 947,934,324,383 | 100% | ||
| ausbitbank | 0 | 119,429,932,938 | 100% |
>he chose to (in order): assign blame, be passive aggressive, play the victim, and then speculate about malice—without basis. Not to mention the DAWN project which I believe he is involved in and their recent cointelegraph article, with the timing in mind you could very well class this as pure FUD.
| post_id | 2,047,884 |
|---|---|
| author | acidyo |
| permlink | re-sneak-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170226t201345718z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-02-26 20:13:45 |
| last_update | 2017-02-26 20:13:45 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 3 |
| net_rshares | 207,795,813,093 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.070 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.023 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 300 |
| author_reputation | 1,572,775,251,470,663 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| l0k1 | 0 | 207,492,430,645 | 100% | ||
| johnthehoan | 0 | 303,382,448 | 100% |
This one https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-powered-dawn-reinvents-social-networks-as-we-know-them?
| post_id | 2,049,180 |
|---|---|
| author | abit |
| permlink | re-acidyo-re-sneak-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170227t001222321z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-powered-dawn-reinvents-social-networks-as-we-know-them?"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-02-27 00:13:00 |
| last_update | 2017-02-27 00:13:00 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 106 |
| author_reputation | 111,629,191,115,088 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I read the article @abit linked below. It couldn't be more vague. *sniffs* "Is that vapour in your ware?"
| post_id | 2,053,551 |
|---|---|
| author | l0k1 |
| permlink | re-acidyo-re-sneak-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170227t173111522z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["abit"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-02-27 17:31:12 |
| last_update | 2017-02-27 17:31:12 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 116,444,184,615 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.038 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.012 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 108 |
| author_reputation | 94,769,080,451,415 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ausbitbank | 0 | 116,444,184,615 | 100% |
No vapor is found at github.com/dawn-project/glogchain And we'd be honored to have you as a user, @l0k1.
| post_id | 2,081,100 |
|---|---|
| author | faddat |
| permlink | re-acidyo-re-sneak-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-re-watervapor-re-dantheman-steem-and-bitshares-cryptographic-security-update-20170304t003829370z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["l0k1"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-03-04 00:38:30 |
| last_update | 2017-03-04 00:38:30 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-28 00:32:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 106 |
| author_reputation | 36,587,550,369,900 |
| root_title | "Steem & BitShares Cryptographic Security Update" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |