RE: Regarding Transisto and Flagging by anarcho-andrei

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @negativer/re-anarcho-andrei-regarding-transisto-and-flagging-20171120t030906766z

· @anarcho-andrei ·
$0.51
Exactly.  There's plenty of material deserving of flags.  Material that is original and has some value in the quality of the content should not be flagged because the user doesn't have a large following.  This episode has exposed some of the most arrogant reasoning I've ever seen on Steemit, and I've seen a lot.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id18,182,330
authoranarcho-andrei
permlinkre-negativer-re-anarcho-andrei-regarding-transisto-and-flagging-20171120t031556758z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/2.0.0", "community": "busy", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-11-20 03:15:54
last_update2017-11-20 03:15:54
depth2
children0
net_rshares221,424,218,839
last_payout2017-11-27 03:15:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.408 SBD
curator_payout_value0.099 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length313
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"Regarding Transisto and Flagging"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)