RE: Improving Steem’s rankings to cater to diverse content preferences by anonymint

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @mirealidadjoff/re-anonymint-improving-steem-s-rankings-to-cater-to-diverse-content-preferences-20160718t131911563z

· @anonymint ·
My proposal is not designed to diminish the rewards for content that voters are truly interested in up voting. My proposal is merely to untie votes from a one-size-fits-all preference, so that different voters can be grouped (clustered) automatically (algorithmically) by their relative like-mindedness, as measured by the similarity of their voting patterns over time.

In short, I am proposing an improvement which will be computed automatically behind the the scenes and which will give us more relevant rankings so that we all hopefully see the sort of content we are most interested in.

Soon there will be so much content that we otherwise will not be able to find the content we are interested in.
properties (22)
post_id125,759
authoranonymint
permlinkre-mirealidadjoff-re-anonymint-improving-steem-s-rankings-to-cater-to-diverse-content-preferences-20160718t195554912z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2016-07-18 19:55:42
last_update2016-07-18 19:55:42
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-08-23 20:19:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length704
author_reputation28,256,027,925,444
root_title"Improving Steem’s rankings to cater to diverse content preferences"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000