Viewing a response to: @clayop/proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers
I think this is too complicated.
| post_id | 11,102,798 |
|---|---|
| author | lennstar |
| permlink | re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t081133318z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2017-08-26 08:11:36 |
| last_update | 2017-08-26 08:11:36 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 3 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-09-02 08:11:36 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 32 |
| author_reputation | 38,213,975,622,361 |
| root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
And too expensive. I suspect that ~90+% of current Steemers couldn't join a village today. I couldn't.
| post_id | 11,131,661 |
|---|---|
| author | valued-customer |
| permlink | re-lennstar-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t160551135z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2017-08-26 16:05:54 |
| last_update | 2017-08-26 16:05:54 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 2 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:05:54 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 104 |
| author_reputation | 48,231,784,822,393 |
| root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
You may misunderstand. Users can freely use any village unless they are blacklisted.
| post_id | 11,132,665 |
|---|---|
| author | clayop |
| permlink | re-valued-customer-re-lennstar-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t162001503z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2017-08-26 16:20:00 |
| last_update | 2017-08-26 16:20:00 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:20:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 84 |
| author_reputation | 274,017,170,680,915 |
| root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I would never plunk down $5k to create a village that just anyone could join, particularly if that new account could cause the entire village to lose the ability to earn rewards.
| post_id | 11,156,760 |
|---|---|
| author | valued-customer |
| permlink | re-clayop-re-valued-customer-re-lennstar-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t225236729z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2017-08-26 22:52:39 |
| last_update | 2017-08-26 22:52:39 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-09-02 22:52:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 178 |
| author_reputation | 48,231,784,822,393 |
| root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |