RE: Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else? by lukestokes

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @dadview/re-lukestokes-201776t16277898z

· @lukestokes ·
$0.04
Hey Darryl! Thanks for commenting.

So... this is awkward for me. We were roommates in college. I've now become an "orca" which is one step below a whale. Is it wrong if I upvote your comments as part of my "inner group"? Or is that a benefit I get for earning Steem Power for so long and rewarding my friends?

The 80% cap is an interesting idea, but they can already do that be self-limiting their own voting power. They could vote thousands of times with only a 1% vote, right?

(btw, my question is somewhat rhetorical, I'm going to upvote you anyway because it's also a great comment).
👍  
properties (23)
post_id6,376,258
authorlukestokes
permlinkre-dadview-re-lukestokes-201776t16277898z-20170706t204038196z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-07-06 20:40:36
last_update2017-07-06 20:40:36
depth2
children4
net_rshares7,730,891,624
last_payout2017-07-13 20:40:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.036 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length590
author_reputation395,063,281,398,324
root_title"Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dadview ·
$0.39
I agree that the larger fish have paid their dues to create a community that people want to join.
I don't disagree with upvoting your inner group as that is how it is currently set up. You play with the hand that you are dealt.

It was just an idea that came up while reading alot of 
Comments and posts complaining about votes being given to friends over content.

No matter how a system is set up, there will be those who look for ways to abuse it. Those who use it as intended are the ones who will help new comers flock to Steemit and stay!
👍  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id6,382,773
authordadview
permlinkre-lukestokes-201776t18358860z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.6", "format": "markdown+html", "community": "esteem", "tags": "steemit"}"
created2017-07-06 22:04:00
last_update2017-07-06 22:04:00
depth3
children1
net_rshares87,121,986,029
last_payout2017-07-13 22:04:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.390 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length544
author_reputation7,644,222,742,525
root_title"Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else?"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@elfspice ·
The last point, this is important, though I would qualify it by saying that the wisdom developed during the dialogue about these things, and even game theory models and statistical analysis, is how we get more people involved, get them to hold more than spend, and get more of their friends to also join.

Even when there is 'voting circles' not everyone who plays just runs an autovoting bot, and ignoring the entire rest of the platform's userbase. That would be quite strange, really.
properties (22)
post_id6,429,742
authorelfspice
permlinkre-dadview-re-lukestokes-201776t18358860z-20170707t100654202z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-07-07 10:06:57
last_update2017-07-07 10:06:57
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 10:06:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length487
author_reputation-3,991,270,030,659
root_title"Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@demotruk · (edited)
I don't think that's wrong. It's a perk, and you are still using it socially to distribute stake (unlike a self vote which only increases the stake of the voter, which is the opposite of distribution as you have not diluted your own stake). If people feel you're going overboard with it, they can counter your votes.
properties (22)
post_id6,433,616
authordemotruk
permlinkre-lukestokes-re-dadview-re-lukestokes-201776t16277898z-20170707t110437475z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-07-07 11:04:36
last_update2017-07-07 12:46:51
depth3
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 11:04:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length316
author_reputation96,481,588,331,838
root_title"Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@lukestokes ·
Well said.
properties (22)
post_id6,448,630
authorlukestokes
permlinkre-demotruk-re-lukestokes-re-dadview-re-lukestokes-201776t16277898z-20170707t141205791z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-07-07 14:12:06
last_update2017-07-07 14:12:06
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-14 14:12:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length10
author_reputation395,063,281,398,324
root_title"Self-Voting: Scammy Behavior, Rational ROI, or Something Else?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000