Viewing a response to: @penguinpablo/steem-stats-report-january-10-4-108-new-accounts
Either they were busy focusing on the mess after the lay offs or it took much longer for them to get a load of new users.
| post_id | 68,626,947 |
|---|---|
| author | mentalhealthguru |
| permlink | re-penguinpablo-steem-stats-report-january-10-4-108-new-accounts-20190110t082115452z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-01-10 08:21:15 |
| last_update | 2019-01-10 08:21:15 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 23,337,412,571 |
| last_payout | 2019-01-17 08:21:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 121 |
| author_reputation | 2,000,373,585,325 |
| root_title | "Steem Stats Report - January 10 - 4,108 new accounts" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| penguinpablo | 0 | 23,337,412,571 | 1% |