Viewing a response to: @pachenko/why-inequality-on-steemit-is-a-good-thing
It's an interesting point of view, I'll give you that. I still think that we need better filters for the content so the gap between the lost good shit and the average trending crap shrinks. Also, there I hope the upvoting system will change in the near future because whales are basically owning the platform now, it's probably for the best but I'm a bit sad that science, economics & art stuff don't make it to the front page. We'll see if the tide turn which I hope. As for what you wrote, it's indeed true and some inequality creates competition which will motivate people but if there's too much of it, a lot of folks will just become bitter and give a bad name to Steemit, let's see!
post_id | 317,225 |
---|---|
author | mystis |
permlink | re-pachenko-why-inequality-on-steemit-is-a-good-thing-20160728t165633493z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2016-07-28 16:56:33 |
last_update | 2016-07-28 16:56:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 27,341,122,684 |
last_payout | 2016-08-28 05:02:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.046 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.006 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 689 |
author_reputation | 141,253,754,462 |
root_title | "Why Inequality on Steemit is a Good Thing!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
stoner19 | 0 | 844,645,456 | 0% | ||
pachenko | 0 | 26,496,477,228 | 100% |