Viewing a response to: @clayop/proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers
Hey @clayop that's an interesting proposal. I have one question and one observation - <strong>Would abusers be given a chance to reform?</strong> Or abuser just be moved from "village" to village without ever having another chance to be rewarded for good behavior? You have to take into consideration that there loads of articles online (some even here at Steemit) which 'teach' new users to essentially 'game' the system. Chances are that many new users wont even know that they are doing anything wrong. So would there be a chance for reform? <strong>Lastly, I don't know that downvoting a village (rather than the individual) would be very fair to the residents.</strong> Furthermore, it may stifle free thought and expression. I don't really want my neighbors in the "village" becoming the #Thought-Police. Just imagine if some the neighborhood starts posting about politics... somebody (or several people) is about to get kicked out of the village and labeled an abuser. I commend you for your creative proposal but it may need some amount of amendment to make things more practical and to keep free thought alive here at Steemit.
post_id | 11,080,838 |
---|---|
author | nandibear |
permlink | re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t000053799z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["clayop"], "tags": ["thought-police", "steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 00:00:54 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 00:00:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 11 |
net_rshares | 2,298,627,102 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 00:00:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,147 |
author_reputation | 1,012,874,308,821 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nandibear | 0 | 2,298,627,102 | 100% |
Village is not a group of users but just a space to post (like a local market). An abuser in bad town can do good behaviors in a good village.
post_id | 11,081,666 |
---|---|
author | clayop |
permlink | re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t001954332z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 00:19:54 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 00:19:54 |
depth | 2 |
children | 10 |
net_rshares | 2,141,902,526 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 00:19:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 142 |
author_reputation | 274,017,170,680,915 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nandibear | 0 | 2,141,902,526 | 100% |
Hi @clayop thanks for replying and helping me understand a bit more regarding your proposal.
post_id | 11,081,837 |
---|---|
author | nandibear |
permlink | re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t002407983z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["clayop"], "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 00:24:09 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 00:24:09 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 2,089,661,001 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 00:24:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 92 |
author_reputation | 1,012,874,308,821 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nandibear | 0 | 2,089,661,001 | 100% |
Thanks!
post_id | 11,090,440 |
---|---|
author | clayop |
permlink | re-nandibear-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t033623978z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 03:36:24 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 03:36:24 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 03:36:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 7 |
author_reputation | 274,017,170,680,915 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
nonetheless, according to your proposal, it would seem that one abuser in the village could draw the 'sin city' flag, and no one in the village would be able to gain rewards. >"...users can vote for village. But unlike witness vote, villages can be upvoted or downvoted. If a village has negative voting score, all posts in that village cannot be rewarded."
post_id | 11,131,496 |
---|---|
author | valued-customer |
permlink | re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t160318153z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 16:03:21 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 16:03:21 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:03:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 360 |
author_reputation | 48,231,784,822,393 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
That's like 51% attack. We surely have more stake held by good users than abusers.
post_id | 11,132,445 |
---|---|
author | clayop |
permlink | re-valued-customer-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t161658713z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 16:17:00 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 16:17:00 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:17:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 82 |
author_reputation | 274,017,170,680,915 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
So, when a village, composed of 100 Steemers who have each paid 5000 Steem, gets blacklisted, and those 100 people give up on the village, what happens to the 500,000 Steem they paid to join it when it disbands? If one Steemer wants out, what happens to their 5k investment?
post_id | 11,131,936 |
---|---|
author | valued-customer |
permlink | re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t160956426z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 16:10:00 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 16:11:09 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:10:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 275 |
author_reputation | 48,231,784,822,393 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Users dont pay for the village fee. It is paid by the creator once and the village is opened to everyone.
post_id | 11,132,589 |
---|---|
author | clayop |
permlink | re-valued-customer-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t161905509z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-08-26 16:19:06 |
last_update | 2017-08-26 16:19:06 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-09-02 16:19:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 105 |
author_reputation | 274,017,170,680,915 |
root_title | "[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |