RE: [Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers by nandibear

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @clayop/proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers

· @nandibear ·
Hey @clayop that's an interesting proposal.  I have one question and one observation -

<strong>Would abusers be given a chance to reform?</strong>  Or abuser just be moved from "village" to village without ever having another chance to be rewarded for good behavior?

You have to take into consideration that there loads of articles online (some even here at Steemit) which 'teach' new users to essentially 'game' the system.

Chances are that many new users wont even know that they are doing anything wrong.

So would there be a chance for reform?

<strong>Lastly, I don't know that downvoting a village (rather than the individual) would be very fair to the residents.</strong>  Furthermore, it may stifle free thought and expression.  I don't really want my neighbors in the "village" becoming the #Thought-Police.

Just imagine if some the neighborhood starts posting about politics... somebody (or several people) is about  to get kicked out of the village and labeled an abuser.

I commend you for your creative proposal but it may need some amount of amendment to make things more practical and to keep free thought alive here at Steemit.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id11,080,838
authornandibear
permlinkre-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t000053799z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["clayop"], "tags": ["thought-police", "steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 00:00:54
last_update2017-08-26 00:00:54
depth1
children11
net_rshares2,298,627,102
last_payout2017-09-02 00:00:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,147
author_reputation1,012,874,308,821
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@clayop ·
Village is not a group of users but just a space to post (like a local market). An abuser in bad town can do good behaviors in a good village.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id11,081,666
authorclayop
permlinkre-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t001954332z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 00:19:54
last_update2017-08-26 00:19:54
depth2
children10
net_rshares2,141,902,526
last_payout2017-09-02 00:19:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length142
author_reputation274,017,170,680,915
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@nandibear ·
Hi @clayop thanks for replying and helping me understand a bit more regarding your proposal.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id11,081,837
authornandibear
permlinkre-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t002407983z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["clayop"], "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 00:24:09
last_update2017-08-26 00:24:09
depth3
children1
net_rshares2,089,661,001
last_payout2017-09-02 00:24:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length92
author_reputation1,012,874,308,821
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@clayop ·
Thanks!
properties (22)
post_id11,090,440
authorclayop
permlinkre-nandibear-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t033623978z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 03:36:24
last_update2017-08-26 03:36:24
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 03:36:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length7
author_reputation274,017,170,680,915
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@valued-customer ·
nonetheless, according to your proposal, it would seem that one abuser in the village could draw the 'sin city' flag, and no one in the village would be able to gain rewards.  

>"...users can vote for village. But unlike witness vote, villages can be upvoted or downvoted. If a village has negative voting score, all posts in that village cannot be rewarded."
properties (22)
post_id11,131,496
authorvalued-customer
permlinkre-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t160318153z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 16:03:21
last_update2017-08-26 16:03:21
depth3
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 16:03:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length360
author_reputation48,231,784,822,393
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
That's like 51% attack. We surely have more stake held by good users than abusers.
properties (22)
post_id11,132,445
authorclayop
permlinkre-valued-customer-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t161658713z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 16:17:00
last_update2017-08-26 16:17:00
depth4
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 16:17:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length82
author_reputation274,017,170,680,915
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@valued-customer · (edited)
So, when a village, composed of 100 Steemers who have each paid 5000 Steem, gets blacklisted, and those 100 people give up on the village, what happens to the 500,000 Steem they paid to join it when it disbands?

If one Steemer wants out, what happens to their 5k investment?
properties (22)
post_id11,131,936
authorvalued-customer
permlinkre-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t160956426z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 16:10:00
last_update2017-08-26 16:11:09
depth3
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 16:10:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length275
author_reputation48,231,784,822,393
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
Users dont pay for the village fee. It is paid by the creator once and the village is opened to everyone.
properties (22)
post_id11,132,589
authorclayop
permlinkre-valued-customer-re-clayop-re-nandibear-re-clayop-proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers-20170826t161905509z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 16:19:06
last_update2017-08-26 16:19:06
depth4
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 16:19:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length105
author_reputation274,017,170,680,915
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000