Your attitude is best summed up by your user name :-)

Please be nice.

Good point. If you know how it can be done better, please teach us. Or would you like to do it for us? Many thanks.

[Nesting]
>I should know what you are doing, in order to suggest other ways. If it is just a wargame, I don't think to have any hint for you to do it better. If the purpose is another one, I don't know which it is. (Well, I know what you and other gamers say about it, but words are just words, in the real world. Sorry.)

This doesn't help..

I've explained the purpose above, quoted below:
> What we're doing, is in the hope of wider reward distribution, to satisfy more users, but less concentration on a few authors. 

Reasons in this post: https://steemit.com/steem/@abit/definition-of-a-whale-and-a-whale-like-group-and-the-math-behind

Thanks.

//Edit:
More info:
https://steemit.com/steem/@timcliff/the-whale-voting-experiment-explained-including-downvotes-from-abit
https://steemit.com/experiment/@timcliff/the-whale-no-vote-experiment-whale-participation-data

[Nesting]
>Still can't see the purpose. 

The ultimate purpose: A hope of more adoption, then, a hope of higher value of this platform (also my holdings)

>(Btw, I often wander, in my time on Steemit, why people assumes as true that a larger distribution of voting power is surely a good thing, in order to have the platform growing up. 

I don't know either. So sometimes wanted to try something new.

>And that implementing that larger distrubution of vp by means of legit violence and power has positive effects and negligible consequences.)

Agree.