RE: Counter proposal - A week without bots by playfulfoodie

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @l0k1/re-playfulfoodie-re-l0k1-re-playfulfoodie-re-l0k1-re-playfulfoodie-counter-proposal-a-week-without-bots-20170314t100040618z

· @playfulfoodie ·
Thanks a lot for your explanation of this. I myself hadn't seen such a clear explanation yet and, even though I don't mind testing during beta anyway, I do understand the reasons behind this more clearly now.

It's a shame there's a division in the top influencers about it, as that trickles down to the rest of us Steemians aswell. Hench all the negativity surrounding this experiment.

I understand people being reluctant to let go of their income ofcourse, but if this change will lead to a fairer reward distribution, wouldn't that also lead to a better, or at the very least more varied quality of posts? This should only help to increase wider acception of Steemit, meaning more chances of the Steem price going up. That would lead to a bigger income in the end.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,145,526
authorplayfulfoodie
permlinkre-l0k1-re-playfulfoodie-re-l0k1-re-playfulfoodie-re-l0k1-re-playfulfoodie-counter-proposal-a-week-without-bots-20170314t111829642z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-03-14 11:18:30
last_update2017-03-14 11:18:30
depth6
children0
net_rshares107,026,115,540
last_payout2017-04-14 10:32:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length768
author_reputation76,246,905,464,437
root_title"Counter proposal - A week without bots"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)