Viewing a response to: @picokernel/re-ripplerm-re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170227t200743220z
nice clarification. btw, the current curation scheme is actually biased towards up-vote IMO. (up-voters always has potential to earn something, while down-voters has zero potential earning while still losing his votes power) if we were to make the game fairer, we should also reward the down-voters if a post end-up in a negative value in total-accumulated-votes. but, to do this, we had to first decouple the curation reward from post-reward, as suggested here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@ripplerm/proposal-decoupling-curation-rewards-from-post-s
post_id | 2,056,941 |
---|---|
author | ripplerm |
permlink | re-picokernel-re-ripplerm-re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170228t045818939z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steemit/@ripplerm/proposal-decoupling-curation-rewards-from-post-s"], "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
created | 2017-02-28 04:58:18 |
last_update | 2017-02-28 04:58:18 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-03-30 19:47:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 553 |
author_reputation | 12,915,496,650,148 |
root_title | "A brief note on community building and the role of government interference." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |