RE: [Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers by tarekadam

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @clayop/proposal-a-new-efficient-way-to-cope-with-abusers

· @tarekadam ·
$0.41
This is a good post and I am happy that you thought about a way to fight abuse. 

From my understanding the concept of villages is similar to what Steemit.inc is working on, communities. Even though I am looking very much forward to the implementation of this I am not sure it can address the in my view most damaging abuse which are **bot self upvotes**.

Checking the content of either village or community still remains a manual task by humans and therefore has only minimal effect in fighting bot votes. 

To effectively change this kind of abuse I think a code change to comment rewards is required that either 

- Reduce comment payouts.
- Prevents self votes. (e.g. if post and comment IP match than block vote).
- Remove comment rewards entirely.
👍  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id11,082,526
authortarekadam
permlinkre-clayop-2017826t24023273z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.6", "format": "markdown+html", "community": "esteem", "tags": "steemit"}"
created2017-08-26 00:40:24
last_update2017-08-26 00:40:24
depth1
children2
net_rshares108,097,058,066
last_payout2017-09-02 00:40:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.407 SBD
curator_payout_value0.002 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length754
author_reputation48,977,881,936,844
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@clayop ·
$0.39
Communities are off chain but villages are on-chain that can influence rewards. Bot self voting can be addressed by 1) mods blacklist bots in the village, and 2) users downvote villages (so no reward) those mods allow bot self-voting.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id11,082,741
authorclayop
permlinkre-tarekadam-re-clayop-2017826t24023273z-20170826t004552171z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-08-26 00:45:51
last_update2017-08-26 00:45:51
depth2
children1
net_rshares97,995,415,784
last_payout2017-09-02 00:45:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.294 SBD
curator_payout_value0.097 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length234
author_reputation274,017,170,680,915
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tarekadam ·
Thank you for clarifying. The solution sounds good.
properties (22)
post_id11,097,335
authortarekadam
permlinkre-clayop-2017826t81651891z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.6", "format": "markdown+html", "community": "esteem", "tags": "steemit"}"
created2017-08-26 06:16:57
last_update2017-08-26 06:16:57
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-09-02 06:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length51
author_reputation48,977,881,936,844
root_title"[Proposal] A New Efficient Way to Cope with Abusers"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000