RE: Regarding Transisto and Flagging by vimukthi

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @embracingchaos/re-anarcho-andrei-regarding-transisto-and-flagging-20171121t152615845z

· @vimukthi ·
$0.07
This is exactly what I've been talking about even before all this started happening.https://steemit.com/steemit/@skeptic/the-steemit-issues-arguments-from-the-other-side-part-1-censorship I had some comments on the above posts and I spent few hours comment on the current matters all over the place.

steemit is a simple might (voting weight) makes it right platform where there is no constitution. I've been told that SMTs can solve this. But it won't change steemit at the protocol level. The only way that can get anything done on steemit is voting weight. Bitcoin needs a 51% attack. On steemit, any amount counts. My average revenue per vote is 4 cents. A whale can easily have 1000 times that.  Without clear pre-defined rules, steemit won't prosper as it should.

Flagging any content with quality is a zero sum game. It's just like war or presidential elections. It's a waste of energy and resources. Understand that this is a war. Get more Voting weight on the good side and understand that this needs to stop.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id18,394,177
authorvimukthi
permlinkre-embracingchaos-re-anarcho-andrei-regarding-transisto-and-flagging-20171122t071833796z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steemit/@skeptic/the-steemit-issues-arguments-from-the-other-side-part-1-censorship"], "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-11-22 07:18:39
last_update2017-11-22 07:18:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares29,146,215,833
last_payout2017-11-29 07:18:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.052 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,019
author_reputation214,343,891,436,406
root_title"Regarding Transisto and Flagging"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)