RE: Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds // by steemchiller

Viewing a response to: @lordbutterfly/re-steemchiller-pxie2g

steempeak · @steemchiller · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$1.32

>As you can see i got curation 2 times out of 7 in the screenshot. A week ago i got 0/10.

Those are the predicted (coming) rewards, but it would be interesting to see, if you really received a `Curation Reward` operation after payout (in Account Operations). I'm not sure, if the reason could be that not all nodes are running the fixed version 0.22.1 yet. I will wait till all nodes run the current version and report the issue on GitHub, if it's not fixed then.

>So what is the 0.07$ vote value at 100% showing exactly?

It shows that as long as the simulated payout is set to `0`, your 100% vote on a post that got no other votes yet (comment for example) is worth ~ $0.07. But keep in mind that (in reality) you always vote the same amount of `rshares` and your vote's value will go up when other voters vote the same post.

👍 double-u, steembasicincome, chriddi, lordbutterfly, ibc, condeas, luegenbaron, isarmoewe, fw206, practicalthought, muscara, linuxbot, gerdtrudroepke, anli, ezravandi, holycow2019, i-c-e

`post_id`	79,816,949
`author`	steemchiller
`permlink`	pxifi0
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 11:20:27
`last_update`	2019-09-08 11:25:33
`depth`	3
`children`	7
`net_rshares`	4,419,604,336,854
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 11:20:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.662 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.659 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	829
`author_reputation`	278,968,749,422,913
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (17)

voter	rshares	pct
double-u	2,127,665,022,751	100%
isarmoewe	41,603,165,701	100%
anli	3,947,126,896	99%
steembasicincome	1,293,288,407,726	97.36%
chriddi	286,478,906,873	50%
condeas	74,025,631,455	40%
ezravandi	3,803,905,529	1.02%
lordbutterfly	247,078,517,816	100%
practicalthought	23,597,711,254	100%
luegenbaron	43,777,527,430	100%
fw206	28,584,825,192	100%
gerdtrudroepke	13,440,970,941	50%
muscara	22,092,890,570	50%
ibc	195,746,672,039	80%
linuxbot	13,768,442,806	80%
i-c-e	126,041,784	4%
holycow2019	578,570,091	100%

@practicalthought · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$0.07

Wanted to add this so you have more data to work with. On 09/04 and again on 09/05 I voted on posts by @theouterlight. It was right after the 5 minute mark and the amount of curation was very small both times. The posts grew to curation of 30.45 and 41.60 respectively, yet shows 0 pending curation rewards for me. Yesterday I voted in at 6 minutes and that post is showing curation. All other posts I vote on that falls right after that 5 minute bar shows rewards, but I'm still not ruling out a possible glitch in the blockchain timer for some accounts. Hoping though it is some sort of communication glitch from the blockchain to your program though as they should have given me my largest curation rewards of the month, lol.

edited to add that the weight for both votes was 100% as shown as well on SteemWorld.

👍 steemchiller

`post_id`	79,817,200
`author`	practicalthought
`permlink`	pxig2o
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"users":["theouterlight"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 11:32:48
`last_update`	2019-09-08 11:34:45
`depth`	4
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	294,164,168,482
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 11:32:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.033 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.033 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	815
`author_reputation`	33,113,112,148,259
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
steemchiller	0 B		294,164,168,482	75%

@steemchiller · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$1.19

Thanks for your input! I think I can tell you why you don't get curation rewards (directly) for some posts on 3speak:

<a href="https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP4fMgLRCGf5gxHCsqwvUpT6KRHxtGRynsT5d2ccXHjU5/steemworld-reason-for-no-curation-rewards.png"><img src="https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP4fMgLRCGf5gxHCsqwvUpT6KRHxtGRynsT5d2ccXHjU5/steemworld-reason-for-no-curation-rewards.png"></a>

They seem to be experimenting with the curation logic. The setting `allow_curation_rewards` is disabled for those posts, so that all rewards go to the author, which is the beneficiary @likwid.

I think that the voters will receive the curation rewards as liquid STEEM or so...

>the weight for both votes was 100% as shown as well on SteemWorld.

I know this sounds confusing, but there is a field `percentage` and a `weight` for each vote. When a developer talks about the weight, in most cases he means the calculated weight/effect of the vote... ^^

👍 double-u, steembasicincome, chriddi, ibc, yogaworld, condeas, isarmoewe, practicalthought, muscara, gerdtrudroepke, anli, ezravandi, holycow2019, i-c-e, re2pair

`post_id`	79,817,812
`author`	steemchiller
`permlink`	pxihed
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"users":["likwid"],"image":["https:\/\/cdn.steemitimages.com\/DQmP4fMgLRCGf5gxHCsqwvUpT6KRHxtGRynsT5d2ccXHjU5\/steemworld-reason-for-no-curation-rewards.png"],"links":["https:\/\/cdn.steemitimages.com\/DQmP4fMgLRCGf5gxHCsqwvUpT6KRHxtGRynsT5d2ccXHjU5\/steemworld-reason-for-no-curation-rewards.png"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 12:01:27
`last_update`	2019-09-08 12:03:42
`depth`	5
`children`	4
`net_rshares`	4,045,558,664,063
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 12:01:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.596 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.594 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	945
`author_reputation`	278,968,749,422,913
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (15)

voter	rshares	pct
double-u	2,085,145,392,156	100%
isarmoewe	42,452,231,297	100%
anli	3,897,064,211	99%
steembasicincome	1,154,426,540,396	89.43%
chriddi	274,129,829,341	50%
condeas	74,024,225,964	40%
ezravandi	3,808,624,913	1.02%
practicalthought	26,416,876,530	100%
gerdtrudroepke	13,402,426,125	50%
muscara	22,006,817,916	50%
ibc	193,899,741,333	80%
i-c-e	126,917,891	4%
yogaworld	151,243,245,769	100%
holycow2019	569,646,303	100%
re2pair	9,083,918	100%

@practicalthought · Sep 9 '19

Thank you. I was unaware it was possible to disable curation rewards in that way (without it showing rewards declined). Hopefully they will add a feature so we can know, or they might face a situation where curators bypass the 3speak tags.

properties (22)

`post_id`	79,847,093
`author`	practicalthought
`permlink`	pxk7t0
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-09 10:29:24
`last_update`	2019-09-09 10:29:24
`depth`	6
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2019-09-16 10:29:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	239
`author_reputation`	33,113,112,148,259
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@eonwarped · Sep 10 '19

$0.07

I double-checked this: in this case, the curation rewards don't go to the author, they go to to the pool, much like if everyone voted at 0 minutes and took the full penalty.

But yes they also don't show in any interface as such.

Tagging @practicalthought as FYI.

👍 steemchiller, practicalthought, evanvanness

`post_id`	79,895,575
`author`	eonwarped
`permlink`	pxn0go
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"users":["practicalthought"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-10 22:43:36
`last_update`	2019-09-10 22:43:36
`depth`	6
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	318,927,603,049
`last_payout`	2019-09-17 22:43:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.035 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.035 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	264
`author_reputation`	61,975,811,524,573
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
steemchiller	294,081,972,914	75%
practicalthought	23,903,367,095	100%
evanvanness	942,263,040	100%

2 replies

@lordbutterfly · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

Just checked the account operations. I got curation 1 time out of 13 votes to Vikisecrets in last 7 days. 
There seems to be an issue here. 

@gtg any chance you could take a look at this. Would be greatly appreciated.

properties (22)

`post_id`	79,818,644
`author`	lordbutterfly
`permlink`	re-steemchiller-pxiizd
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steempeak\/1.15.5"}
`created`	2019-09-08 12:35:36
`last_update`	2019-09-08 12:36:39
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 12:35:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	219
`author_reputation`	104,712,854,805,089
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000