Viewing a response to: @jerrybanfield/most-steem-post-views-come-after-payout-11
Valuable content should always be appreciated whatever the age of the post. For steemit, since it produces blocks based on periods and simplicity, it has implemented complex algorithm for this issue. I think developers and users should brainstorm a strategy to appreciate (upvote) old but gold post.
post_id | 14,298,586 |
---|---|
author | decentropia |
permlink | re-jerrybanfield-most-steem-post-views-come-after-payout-11-20171002t060807778z |
category | steemsecrets |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemsecrets"]}" |
created | 2017-10-02 06:08:09 |
last_update | 2017-10-02 06:08:09 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 140,538,545,791 |
last_payout | 2017-10-09 06:08:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.354 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.037 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 299 |
author_reputation | 12,429,236,291,513 |
root_title | "Most Steem Post Views Come After Payout! #11" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
riseofth | 0 | 110,019,042,023 | 100% | ||
theia7 | 0 | 21,659,455,111 | 100% | ||
revisesociology | 0 | 8,860,048,657 | 100% |