RE: Why Science Blogging Needs Saving by dhimmel

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @danmaruschak/re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t124428455z

· @dhimmel ·
$0.92
Yeah. It's important to realize signing up new users costs money. I believe Steemit Inc is delegating new users with $10 US+ in STEEM power. Also you do not need to sign up through steemit.com. There are sites that let you pay for yourself and then there is no delay.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id45,358,685
authordhimmel
permlinkre-danmaruschak-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t145203141z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}"
created2018-04-25 14:52:03
last_update2018-04-25 14:52:03
depth2
children0
net_rshares143,235,632,795
last_payout2018-05-02 14:52:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.910 SBD
curator_payout_value0.007 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length267
author_reputation33,884,415,613,920
root_title"Why Science Blogging Needs Saving"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)