Viewing a response to: @simoxenham/why-science-blogging-needs-saving
Yes, we really do need to bridge the gap between academics and the rest of the world. It would be nice to have at least 50% of the information we take in to be educational. Leave 25% for the entertainment industry and 25 for some 'real' news. At least thats how id like my social media feed and search findings to be like. I cant even find that scholarly search option on google anymore. Thank you for bringing some scientific material onto this platform.
post_id | 45,373,763 |
---|---|
author | kchitrah |
permlink | re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t163729023z |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
created | 2018-04-25 16:37:33 |
last_update | 2018-04-25 16:37:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 14,733,643,372 |
last_payout | 2018-05-02 16:37:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.070 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.019 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 461 |
author_reputation | 6,025,595,860,743 |
root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
simoxenham | 0 | 14,733,643,372 | 20% |
That would be wonderful, if only. It still exists, scholar.google.com is what you're after!
post_id | 45,403,984 |
---|---|
author | simoxenham |
permlink | re-kchitrah-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t204907945z |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
created | 2018-04-25 20:49:06 |
last_update | 2018-04-25 20:49:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 230,685,322 |
last_payout | 2018-05-02 20:49:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 91 |
author_reputation | 10,797,751,623,277 |
root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kchitrah | 0 | 230,685,322 | 100% |
Nice! Thank you. It used to be a tab option though. But i'll take what i can get. ;)
post_id | 45,465,411 |
---|---|
author | kchitrah |
permlink | re-simoxenham-re-kchitrah-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180426t061801537z |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
created | 2018-04-26 06:18:03 |
last_update | 2018-04-26 06:18:03 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-05-03 06:18:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 85 |
author_reputation | 6,025,595,860,743 |
root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Here is a post I wrote about finding [free scientific articles](https://steemit.com/steemstem/@lesshorrible/how-to-find-scientific-sources-for-free), if you are looking for some science news. I would recommend Nature Communications - good for scrolling through and looking for an interesting science read. Cheers!
post_id | 45,617,348 |
---|---|
author | lesshorrible |
permlink | re-kchitrah-re-simoxenham-re-kchitrah-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180427t032754906z |
category | steemstem |
json_metadata | "{"links": ["https://steemit.com/steemstem/@lesshorrible/how-to-find-scientific-sources-for-free"], "app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
created | 2018-04-27 03:28:00 |
last_update | 2018-04-27 03:28:00 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 332,988,045 |
last_payout | 2018-05-04 03:28:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 313 |
author_reputation | 7,318,876,931,172 |
root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kchitrah | 0 | 332,988,045 | 100% | ||
bartelby | 0 | 0 | 100% |