RE: Why Science Blogging Needs Saving by simoxenham

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @danmaruschak/re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t124428455z

· @simoxenham ·
$0.26
Yeah, hopefully they will find a way to speed account approval up soon. On the plus side, I understand their procedures help fight against spammers which improves the network and the ability to earn for all us genuine users!
👍  
properties (23)
post_id45,342,925
authorsimoxenham
permlinkre-danmaruschak-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t130217449z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}"
created2018-04-25 13:02:18
last_update2018-04-25 13:02:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares41,178,160,636
last_payout2018-05-02 13:02:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.200 SBD
curator_payout_value0.063 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length224
author_reputation10,797,751,623,277
root_title"Why Science Blogging Needs Saving"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)